Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 1-4
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE the accents in the first four bars, just like in the practically entire piece, are short. It is an arbitrary change of the revisers. Long accents, most probably written by Chopin in [A], are present here only in FE. The first three accents of GE introduce a certain ambiguity, since their typeface is slightly different (they are narrower) than of the remaining marks in this source – perhaps they are also supposed to be interpreted as long. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The engraver of GE undoubtedly overlooked the crotchet stem of g in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In GE there is no cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In GE there is no cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 38-39
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In FE one can see traces of proofreading of an earlier, inaccurate slur, encompassing four semiquavers only. This too short slur is present also in GE, which most probably means that the correction in FE was performed in the last stage of proofreading. The absence of the slur in EE1 resulted from the engraver's oversight, corrected in EE2 (→EE3), most probably on the basis of comparison with GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
next to f1, which may suggest that in 
